Take Action Publications Press Room About Public Citizen Public Citizen Divisions Home
Promoting a sustainable energy future

JOIN US! |Take Action | Publications | About Energy Program | Contact Us
Search

For Keyword(s)
advanced search

Email Signup

Sign up for our free activist updates.

United Kingdom

In 1988, the Margaret Thatcher-led government privatized England and Wales' water systems through full asset sales.  It quickly attracted several multinational water barons including: Thames WaterNorthumbrian Water (Suez) and International Water (Bechtel).  Reasons cited for this move included that the private sector would be more efficient in running the system and provide better services than the pre-existing government agencies.  Though pioneering water privatization, the implementation of privatization has yielded different results for the public.

Prices for water rose over 46% in the first nine years of privatization.[1]  This increase has led to low-income households being disconnected from water due to their inability to pay their water bills.  The disconnections have raised health concerns: lack of water hinders good hygiene practices (i.e. bathing).  Also, some families had to choose between acquiring basic necessities (such as food) and paying their water bill.  The companies responded by installing pre-payment meters for customers who had difficulty paying their bills.  These customers only received water when the meter was charged with a card.  Widespread public disapproval led to the outlaw of disconnections and pre-payment meters in 1998. Due to the price gauging, water rates were cut in 1999 by an average of 12.3%, but are still a heavy burden for low-income households.

The increase in water rates facilitated great profits for U.K. water companies.  Pre-tax profits rose by 142% in the first eight years of privatization.  These profits were directed to companies’ dividends instead of being used to lower customers’ bills or fund promised improvements to the infrastructure of the system.  When profits began to fall in the late 1990s, companies looked to restructure themselves to protect their assets and abilities to make future profits.

The quality of the water system has declined since it was privatized.  In 1998, reports by the Drinking Water Inspectorate (DWI), which is responsible for monitoring water quality, “concluded there are still weaknesses in companies’ performance.”[2]  This has resulted in DWI lodging a record number of prosecutions against companies for violations of water quality standards.  There are also environmental concerns: “The wastewater and water companies are responsible for 1 in 5 pollution incidents.”[3]  The Environmental Agency, responsible for monitoring environmental pollution, reported that 14,374 water pollution incidents occurred in 1999.

Water privatization has also had a negative impact on workers.  From 1990 to 1999, more than 8,500 water worker jobs have been lost: a decrease of 21.5%. During this same time, executives of water companies received large fees and bonuses, and some of their salaries increased by as much as 200%.

Privatization has benefited the private water companies more than it has the public. Although some legislation has been passed to improve the current situation, many challenges exist.  There are still concerns that water companies have little incentive to perform infrastructure maintenance that would reduce leakage and lower the risk of sewer flooding.  There are also concerns about how future environmental improvements will be paid for: many think this will lead to another increase in water prices.

In the News:
2005
July 18: Paying for Thames Water's failings 
July 14: Plugging water leaks could supply half a million new homes 
April 20: Thames Water fined £60,000 for polluting Oxfordshire brook
February 18: Thames Water caught short - fined £50,000 
February 8: Undetected leak led to Stanford Brook pollution 
January 20: Thames Water fined for polluting brook

2004
December 7: Thames Water fined for polluting Hendon brook 
October 19: Thames Water fined for fish kill 
October 1: Thames Water fined for sewage in stream 
Coca-Cola Accountability Tour, UK October 6-17

2003
30 July: Repeat offenders take the shine off pollution reductions

2002
August 11: Top bosses 'hijacking' eco-summit
August 6: Lobby groups query Thames Water pay 

2001
October 1: Thames Water top UK polluter, says govt body

2000
February 22: Water firm fined for flooding homes with sewage

Water for All initiated a new collaborative website to help coordinate our global campaign focusing on the water transnational, Suez. The website is tri-lingal and collects information regarding the abuses, problematic projects, community protests, and exploitative policies of Suez, Go to:
English - www.stopsuez.org
Spanish - www.fuerasuez.org
French - www.arretonssuez.org


[1] Emanuele Lobina for Public Services International Research Unit, UK Water Privatisation – A Briefing (2001).
[2] Ibid.
[3] Lobina, p. 20.

    » cmep | Water | cmep Water | reports | uk


Because Public Citizen does not accept funds from corporations, professional associations or government agencies, we can remain independent and follow the truth wherever it may lead. But that means we depend on the generosity of concerned citizens like you for the resources to fight on behalf of the public interest. If you would like to help us in our fight, click here.


Publications
Join | Contact PC | Contribute | Site Map | Careers/Internships| Privacy Statement